Since I was a little boy, I
have read the Bible many times. There is not a verse of the Bible I have not
read. And each time I read the Bible, I pray to God to send his Holy Spirit to
help me understand his word clearly.
Today, I comment on Mathew 24, a chapter of the book of Mathew that has
been used constantly to deny that Simeo Melkio is the Messiah.
The
Question of Context
I have met several pastors,
some greatly schooled in theology, and I have been shocked at the way they tend
to ignore the context of most writings in the Bible. I do not understand how
someone can claim his interpretation of the Bible is guided by the Holy Spirit
yet he routinely reads verses and uses them out of context. By context, we mean
the circumstances, situation or background of a text, chapter or verse of
scripture. Every parable or pronouncement of Jesus was made within a context.
He never spoke in a vacuum. A verse read in isolation and without details on
the circumstances around which the statement quoted was pronounced can mean so
many things to different men. In fact,
reading verses out of context distorts the truth of the word of God.
What
is the Context of Mathew 24?
Mathew 24 is a continuation of
what Jesus was teaching in Mathew 23. If you look at Mathew 23, you will find
the teachings of Jesus on the pretensions of the scribes and Pharisees and the
calamities that shall befall them. Towards the end of Mathew 23, from verses
35-39, Jesus pronounces judgment on the scribes and Pharisees and on Jerusalem.
He talks of how these people kill prophets sent to them by God and reminds them
of the blood of Abel and of Zachariah.
In Mathew 23:36, he pronounces
great calamities upon the generation he was talking to, not another generation.
And in Mathew 23:37-39, Jesus makes a prophecy about the destruction of
Jerusalem because she has stoned and killed servants of God. At the beginning
of Mathew 24, the disciples of Jesus show him the beauty of the Temple of
Jerusalem. But Jesus continues the prophecy he had pronounced towards the end
of Mathew 23, indicating to the disciples that the temple would be destroyed
and no stone would remain on top of another. Shocked by this prophecy, the
disciples of Jesus went to him again to find out when these things (the
destruction of Jerusalem) would come to pass, the signs of his coming and of the end of the age. The rest of chapter 24 is based
on this question, which is first a focus on when Jerusalem would be destroyed and then when the Son of Man would return and the end of the age.
Prophetic
Language of Mathew 24
When many people read the
prophetic language of Mathew 24 such as the “sun will be darkened, the moon
turned to blood and the coming on the clouds of heaven” they incorrectly
associate the phrases and images used ONLY with the second coming of Christ. In
fact, they even take the statements literally and throw the entire chapter out
of context. But if we look back to the context and the audience of Jesus when
he made those predictions, we find out clearly that he covered a broad topic, from destruction of Jerusalem all the way to his return. Jesus used Mathew 24 to make a bold prediction about Jerusalem and
her destruction (FIRST) before engaging on the matter of "signs" of his second coming.
Indeed, the language that Jesus has used in this chapter is similar to the language used in the Old Testament prophecies about the overthrow and destruction of a single nation at a specific time. And the audience he was speaking to clearly understood what he was saying because they were familiar with such language as it had been used to predict the destruction of other nations even before they were born.
Indeed, the language that Jesus has used in this chapter is similar to the language used in the Old Testament prophecies about the overthrow and destruction of a single nation at a specific time. And the audience he was speaking to clearly understood what he was saying because they were familiar with such language as it had been used to predict the destruction of other nations even before they were born.
Previous
Prophecies on Destruction of Nations
To make myself clear, let me
take you through previous prophecies in the Old Testament. Look closely through these verses and observe
the similarity in language with Mathew 24. Let’s start:
(a) Destruction of Babylon
The prophecy is found in Isaiah
13:1, 6-13. The prophet made the prophecy in 730 BC. And as you can see the
language from the verses, you can note that he has used statements such as:
Ø The day
of the Lord is near
Ø Stars
of heaven and constellations will not flash out their light
Ø The sun
will be dark when it rises, the moon will not shed light, earth will tremble
and heaven will shake
Ø Hands
shall fall limb and man’s heart shall melt in terror
Now, you can see that these
statements are almost similar to the ones used in Mathew 24. Yet, when Babylon
was destroyed in 539 BC, these things did not actually occur. However, Babylon
was destroyed just as Isaiah had predicted.
(b) Destruction of Egypt
The prophecy is found in Isaiah
19:1 and was made in 730 BC. When you read it, you find the language containing
phrases like:
Ø The
Lord is riding on a swift cloud and is about to come to Egypt
Ø The
idols of Egypt will tremble in the presence of the Lord
The prophecy was fulfilled in
480BC and the Lord judged Egypt. However, the Lord did not go to Egypt riding
on a literal cloud.
(c) Destruction of Edom
The prophecy is found in Isaiah
34:4-5, was made in 730BC and contains phrases such as:
Ø All
stars (hosts of heaven) will wear away
Ø The sky
will be rolled up like a scroll and all their hosts will wither
When Edom was judged just
before 400BC nothing changed on the sky, yet the prophecy was fulfilled.
(d) Judgment of Egypt
In 590BC, Prophet Ezekiel
pronounced the destruction of Egypt in Ezekiel 30:3-4 and 32:7-8; he used
phrases such as:
Ø The day
of the lord is near
Ø It will
be a day of clouds
Ø Egypt
will be extinguished
Ø Heavens
will be darkened, sun covered with clouds, moon not giving light, stars
darkened
Ø Darkness
on the land and the shining lights of heaven will be dark
When this prophecy was
fulfilled in 480BC, there was no darkness on the land and Egypt was not
extinguished literally.
(e) Destruction of Israel
In 755BC, Amos predicted the
doom upon Israel in Amos 5:18-20 and 8:9. He used phrases such as:
Ø The day
of the lord
Ø Sun
shall go down at noon
Ø Earth
shall be dark in broad daylight
Ø There
will be darkness and no light, gloom without brightness
The prophecy was fulfilled in
722BC without literal darkness and without having the sun going down at noon.
(f) Destruction of Jerusalem
In 630BC, Zephaniah predicted
destruction of Jerusalem (Zephaniah 1:7, 14-16). The same event was predicted
by Jeremiah from 626-586BC (Jeremiah 4:14-16, 19, 23-28; 6:1, 22). In their
predictions, the prophets used a language with these phrases:
Ø The
great day of the Lord is near; near and coming very quickly
Ø It will
be a day of trumpet and battle cry
Ø There
will be sound of trumpet and alarm of war
Ø There
will be no light, the heavens shall be dark
Ø It will
be a day of trouble, wrath, distress, desolation, destruction, darkness, gloom,
clouds and thick darkness
The prophecy was fulfilled in
586BC, but without literal clouds, darkness or trumpets.
(g) Judgement of Egypt
In Jeremiah 46:2-12, we find a
prediction on the coming judgment of Egypt. The prophet calls the coming day as
the day of the Lord. The prophecy was fulfilled in 605BC
(h) Judgement of Nineveh
Nahum predicted the judgement
of Nineveh by stating that “the mountains shall quake”, “the hills melt”, “the
earth burned”, and the “world and all in it destroyed”. The prophecy was fulfilled
in 612BC without literal burning of the earth, melting of hills and quaking of
mountains.
Destruction
of Jerusalem
After looking at the Old Testament
language on the destruction of a nation, let us look at the New Testament
predictions on destruction of Jerusalem.
Ø Mathew
24:29-30: The phrases include sign of the son of man coming in the clouds, sun
darkened, moon turned black, stars falling from the sky, roaring of the sea and
waves, heaven shaken, and men fainting from fear
Ø Mathew
26:64: Phrases used are: Son of man sitting at the right hand of power and
coming upon the clouds of heaven
Ø 2 Peter
3:10-13: Phrases used include: Day of the lord will come, heavens will pass
away with a roar, the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the
earth and works will be burnt up
Ø Revelation
1:7: The phrase is: Christ is coming with clouds
Ø Acts
1:9-11: Christ will return the same way he left...in the clouds
The phrases listed above are similar to those in the Old Testament and clearly point to the judgment of Israel as a nation. This prophecy about destruction of Jerusalem was fulfilled in 70AD. According to Josephus, the Roman army killed people, plundered property, demolished the entire city and destroyed the temple upon the orders of Caesar. This way, the day of the lord came to pass and Jerusalem was destroyed as predicted by Jesus and proclaimed by Peter and others.
The phrases listed above are similar to those in the Old Testament and clearly point to the judgment of Israel as a nation. This prophecy about destruction of Jerusalem was fulfilled in 70AD. According to Josephus, the Roman army killed people, plundered property, demolished the entire city and destroyed the temple upon the orders of Caesar. This way, the day of the lord came to pass and Jerusalem was destroyed as predicted by Jesus and proclaimed by Peter and others.
Second
Coming is a Spiritual Event
It must also be noted that
prophetic pronouncements often contain phrases that are not fulfilled literally. Like
a dream or vision, a prophecy contains images that aren’t fulfilled literally.
An interpretation must be given to the images for them to make literal sense.
In fact, even the images frequently associated with the second coming of Jesus
are not literal but prophetic images.
Those who are expecting graves to break open and people to come out of
them are just an example of individuals confusing a prophetic imagery with a
literal occurrence. Similarly, those expecting Christ to come upon the clouds
of heaven are misinterpreting a prophetic phrase as a literal phrase. Indeed,
just like the first coming of Christ, the second coming is a spiritual event
described in the bible using prophetic terms which should not be
considered purely literal.
Simeo
Ondeto’s Mission in Light of Mathew 24
Many times, I have met pastors
who claim that Ondeto is a false Messiah. The pastors quickly quote Mathew 24:5
to support their argument and assert that Jesus warned against such false
Messiahs. However, a quick glance at Mathew 24:5 revolts against what these
pastors preach about Ondeto. In this verse, Jesus has just been asked when the
destruction of Jerusalem would occur. And he first warns his listeners about
false Messiahs and prophets before he proceeds to declare the time. In fact, he
states that these false Messiahs are to appear way too early before the time of
Jerusalem’s destruction (verse 6). Now, Jerusalem was destroyed in 70AD and
Ondeto’s mission started in 1962AD, meaning the prophecy was not about him.
But
why must Jesus warn his disciples about those claiming to be Messiah?
(a) The Jews expected a political leader who would lead them into
war and defeat their enemies. But Jesus knew this would not work and any
uprisings would fail. Hence, he warns them against following such leaders
(Messiahs).
(b) The coming destruction of Jerusalem is due to God’s judgment for
their failure to heed the warnings of true prophets of the past. It is ordained
by God and any man claiming he can help Jerusalem to escape the judgment of God
must not be believed.
Well, between the period Jesus
spoke these words (around 33AD) and the time Jerusalem was destroyed (70AD),
many Messiahs and prophets arose and claimed to be capable of saving the Jews
from the grip of Rome. They were believed and followed by many, but they failed
just as Jesus had predicted. Equally, the period between 30AD-70AD was a time
of Messianic rumours. People sought for the Messiah here and there. There was war and there were rumours of war. Children
betrayed their parents and great divisions arose. In the end, the day of the
lord came and Jerusalem was destroyed as predicted in Mathew 24.
Moreover, the prophecy in
Mathew 24 is specific just as every prophecy must be specific. A huge portion of it was fulfilled
when Jerusalem was destroyed. In fact, the Day of the Lord came when some of
those that Jesus had spoken to were still alive. And once a prophecy is
fulfilled, it can’t be fulfilled a second time against another generation,
nation or person. Those using this prophecy against Simeo Ondeto are simply
quoting scripture out of context.
To
conclude my commentary, I want to respond to three statements made against
Ondeto.
(a) A pastor called pastor Odhiambo recently said: “Ondeto being a
messiah is heretical. For Jesus to be a saviour of the world, he had to die on
the cross. How did Ondeto die? He was poisoned; so he is not Messiah.
ANSWER
Dear Pastor Odhiambo,
Those who crucified Jesus did
not blame him for claiming he could save the world. The accusations against
Jesus are straightforward: he claimed he could destroy the temple and build it
in three days (Mathew 26: 61), blasphemy (Mathew 26:65); claimed to be Christ
(Mathew 26:66); and he claimed to be king of Jews (Mathew 27:11). These are the
main accusations made against him. And while the accusations were lies against
an innocent person, opponents of Christianity can still raise these points just
as you are raising an irrelevant point against Ondeto. And for sure, the
Gospels record the events leading to Jesus death without claiming he was accused
of intending or working to save the world.
Pastor, if you can put the circumstances
leading to Jesus death in context without giving them interpretation according
to your beliefs or Christian theology, you will end up with the same problems
you are seeking to press on the mission of Simeo Ondeto. For example, on Jesus’
cross was an inscription mocking him as king of the Jews and not saviour of the
world. This was a concise summary of why he was crucified which is quite
contrary to the saviour of world narrative you are preaching.
Nevertheless, I understand what
you mean. The accusers of Jesus did not understand his mission and thought his
claims to be Messiah were heretical. He was proclaiming a spiritual kingdom in
which people enter after their sins are forgiven, yet his accusers expected a
worldly king of the Jews who would deliver them from Roman rule. Today we
believe Jesus is our saviour because we have understood his mission in
spiritual terms.
Therefore, you need to put
Ondeto’s claims in context and then to seek the spiritual explanations given
for the way he came. For instance, while we believe we are forgiven our sins
through Jesus’ death on the cross, Ondeto offers glory to those who obey God, which is a completely different thing that puts no
significance on his death. It is only people like you who want to put any
significance on Ondeto’s death to try and pin down a glorification mission onto a salvation mission in order to score cheap points. He was poisoned yes, but
his death was not part of his mission. It was just the end of his mission, not
the means of helping men to realize the fruits of his mission.
To answer you more precisely,
pastor Odhiambo, I implore you to seek to understand the gist of Ondeto’s
mission. He spoke of and taught about a spiritual Kingdom of God, not a worldly theocracy. He came so you can enter into the glorious presence of God. As Jesus he came to save from sin, but as Simeo he has come to harvest, to reward and to admit us into the presence of God where we are supposed to be forever.
Ondeto died after he had completed his mission while death was part of the mission of Jesus. Ondeto came to glorify men, something achieved without dying for those to be glorified. On the contrary, Jesus could only be a saviour by losing his life. Saving requires sacrifice, glory doesn’t. This is why the death of Jesus is crucial to Christianity while how Ondeto died is not crucial to Legio Maria faithful.
Ondeto died after he had completed his mission while death was part of the mission of Jesus. Ondeto came to glorify men, something achieved without dying for those to be glorified. On the contrary, Jesus could only be a saviour by losing his life. Saving requires sacrifice, glory doesn’t. This is why the death of Jesus is crucial to Christianity while how Ondeto died is not crucial to Legio Maria faithful.
Thank you for your question.
May God lead you into his glory.
(b) A pastor called Jackson Reid wrote to us saying: “Please
friends, note that Christ’s second coming will not be to live with us, but to
take his church. He will come like a thief. You legions must be using another
bible, not the holy one.
ANSWER
Dear Pastor Reid,
We appreciate your zeal in the
Lord and your almost certain knowledge of how the second coming occurs. Thanks
for your question.
Pastor, we agree that the
second coming means we are taken into the presence of God to be in a glorified
state. But our Lord is omnipresent. He
can be on earth and in heaven at the same time. He can dwell in me and in you
at the same time. He can also live with you and with me at the same time. When
the day of the lord came and he was revealed at John Baru’s home, this is
exactly what happened. He was seen in his glory in heaven and was at the same
time seated on a rock in John Baru’s home. He was with the glorified saints in
heaven and was also with men on earth.
Brother Reid, we don’t read a
different bible. However, the Holy Spirit came mightily upon us and revealed
the omnipresent Lord in our midst. The sight of the heavenly throne of God and
of saints and angels singing glorious songs made our brethren to fall down in
worship. After this, they realized that the second coming was not a one-day
event for the lord was on earth for many years yet receiving holy ones into the
mansions of heaven at the same time.
Finally pastor, you may not
believe us because you think you know the scriptures. But according to Jesus,
we should know “both the scriptures and the power of God”. So what I am telling
you is a matter of the power of God in revealing his glory made flesh.
Thank you very much. May you
live to experience that same power of God.
(c) Pastor Odhiambo asked another question: “If Jesus gave us
authority to take deadly poison and not die (Mark 16:17), how comes he himself
subjected to the power of poison? Again, Jesus could discern the mind of his
disciples, so how could he fail to detect poison?”
ANSWER
Pastor Odhiambo, praise the
Lord.
Jesus had power over death, but
he died on the cross. Jesus could have prevented his arrest, but he was
arrested. Jesus could have come down from the cross but he did not? Why do you
speak like the thief who was crucified with Jesus and still found it sensible
to ridicule him?
Ondeto was poisoned 3 times
before he died. In all those occasions, he knew the source of poison and the
intention of those who poisoned him. He openly said his time was up years
before his poisoning. It is not like he wanted to continue living on earth and
his life was cut short by the poison. On the contrary, it was that it was time
for him to depart and poison was just the means to that end.
Thanks for your question. I
pray that you know the glory of God while you still live.